Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temur Otters | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Sultai Dragons | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Unknown Archetype | elvin7 | 7-2 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | strongmind | 6-3 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Dimir Bounce , Dimir Midrange , Domain Zur Overlords , Esper Pixie , Golgari Beanstalk , Golgari Midrange , Golgari Obliterator , Grixis Dragons , Mardu Offering , Orzhov Pixie
Meta Performance Analysis
Scavenger Regent ranks #341 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 84%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 74.5%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Scavenger Regent is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 6.91 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.4%. Scavenger Regent has a win rate of 67.8%, making it 8.9% worse than other 4-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 5 | 65.7% | 2 |
| Gix's Command | Sorcery | 5 | 53.7% | 1 |
| Blot Out | Instant | 5 | 52.4% | 1 |
| Negate | Instant | 8 | 48.6% | 2 |
| Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 6 | 47.6% | 1 |
| Anoint with Affliction | Instant | 10 | 44.8% | 1 |
| Qarsi Revenant | Creature — Vampire | 6 | 42.3% | 1 |
| Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 9 | 41.4% | 1 |
| Jace, the Perfected Mind | Legendary Planeswalker — Jace | 5 | 38.7% | 1 |
| Duress | Sorcery | 17 | 32.9% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Scavenger Regent than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awaken the Honored Dead | Enchantment — Saga | 3 | 5 | 81.8% | 74.8% | +7.0% |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 9 | 78.6% | 71.6% | +7.0% |
| Grim Bauble | Artifact | 1 | 5 | 77.3% | 70.4% | +6.9% |
| Up the Beanstalk | Enchantment | 2 | 8 | 76.2% | 71.0% | +5.2% |
| Deep-Cavern Bat | Creature — Bat | 2 | 7 | 72.3% | 69.2% | +3.1% |
| Qarsi Revenant | Creature — Vampire | 3 | 10 | 69.6% | 66.4% | +3.1% |
| Negate | Instant | 2 | 9 | 72.2% | 71.3% | +0.9% |
| Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 7 | 71.1% | 70.4% | +0.7% |
| Enduring Curiosity | Enchantment Creature — Cat Glimmer | 4 | 8 | 70.0% | 69.9% | +0.1% |
| Nowhere to Run | Enchantment | 2 | 6 | 70.4% | 70.3% | +0.0% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 7 | 0.3% | 74.8% |
| Unknown Archetype | 6 | 1.6% | 28.5% |
| Golgari Beanstalk | 3 | 10.0% | 8.3% |
| Dimir Bounce | 1 | 0.2% | 40.0% |
| Domain Zur Overlords | 1 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.